"Too many meetings" and "our meetings suck" are two of the most common complaints inside any organization — and usually they're the same complaint wearing different clothes.

This episode walks through why meetings go bad, and the specific, practical rules that move a team from ugly to bad to genuinely better.

Why Meetings Go Bad — and the Two Kinds Worth Fixing

Meetings usually suck for the same handful of reasons: no set agenda, no clear purpose walking in, and no real alignment walking out.

It helps to split meetings into two categories. Repetitive meetings — annual planning, quarterly pulsing, weekly L10s — run on a fixed rhythm and agenda by design. Ad hoc meetings are everything else: the one-off conversations that pop up to solve a specific problem.

Here's the counterintuitive part: fixing a death-by-meetings culture often means adding meetings before it means cutting them. A department implementing EOS for the first time often didn't have a strategic pulse at all, so that weekly L10 is genuinely new time on the calendar — the tactical work still has to happen somewhere too.

That's the ugly-to-bad transition: ugly is no cadence at all, just reactive fire-fighting all day. Bad is realizing the problem and adding a few more meetings to get a handle on it. Better comes after, once the right structure is in place and the excess gets trimmed away.

Give Every Team a Working-On and a Working-In Cadence

A team's L10 is where they work on the business. Most teams also need a second, separate cadence for working in it.

Without that second meeting, the L10 starts absorbing tactical work it was never built for — someone needing twenty minutes of help finishing a rock, project updates crowding out the issues list.

The shape of that second meeting depends entirely on the work. An agency might run a twice-weekly traffic meeting. A builder might run a project management sync. A sales team might run a daily stand-up. What matters is that it exists at all, protecting the L10's real purpose and giving tactical work its own dedicated home.

The Small Rules That Shrink the Calendar

A handful of simple constraints can do more to fix a packed calendar than any big restructuring.

Fixed meeting lengths: default to 15, 45, or 90 minutes instead of the typical 30 or 60 — most conversations that get 30 minutes only actually need 15.

No meetings on a given day: blocking one day, like Friday, off the calendar entirely protects real, uninterrupted time for priority work.

Outcome over agenda: put the specific outcome needed — a decision, a defined next step — right in the meeting invite description, so no time gets lost figuring out why everyone's there.

Lower-frequency external syncs: most client relationships don't actually need a weekly touchpoint — biweekly or monthly is often enough, and clients tend to appreciate the tighter cadence rather than resent it.

These same rules apply to external meetings too, not just internal ones. Applying the same 15/45-minute lengths and no-meeting day to client calls tends to produce more focused conversations, not fewer results — a sales process that used to take two client meetings can often collapse into one.

For anyone who doesn't naturally live by a calendar, a personal rhythm helps as much as a company-wide one. A fixed weekly slot for one-on-ones, or a biweekly slot that alternates between two recurring purposes, turns "I should really check in on this" into an actual standing commitment.

Treat Every Repetitive Meeting Like an L10

The L10 format isn't exclusive to internal leadership meetings — it works for any meeting that repeats, including ones with clients.

A check-in on what's on track, accountability on prior to-dos, an IDS-style discussion of what's come up, and a clear conclusion — that structure holds up whether the room is a leadership team or a client relationship.

Ad hoc meetings get simpler once they're treated as exactly what they are: a single-topic IDS session. The only real prep question is what outcome the meeting needs to reach.

A couple of smaller rules round this out. Don't cancel or reschedule a meeting just because one of several invitees can't attend — decide whether they're essential, and if not, keep it moving. And build in a 15-minute buffer around every meeting, not to run long, but to actually close it out: to-dos assigned, delegated, or scheduled before anyone leaves the room, so nothing turns into an open file rattling around in someone's head for the rest of the day.

Final Takeaway: Roll It Out Like a Rock, Not a Mandate

None of this belongs in a Monday-morning company-wide email. Put it on the long-term issues list, discuss it with the leadership team, and consider making the rollout itself a rock for the quarter.

Ugly to bad to better isn't a straight line, but it's a real one — and better is worth building toward on purpose.

< Last Post

Next Post >

Wonder's MAP Brief™ EOS Compatible Marketing Operating System

The One Marketing Document You Didn't Know You Needed: The MAP Brief™

By Jami Mullikin • June 23, 2026

More than a decade ago, I was serving as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for a growing company. We were preparing for annual planning, and like most organizations, we had a long list of things we wanted to accomplish. Before the planning process started, I asked the CEO for thirty minutes. I told him I had one question. "If we jump forward a year and this plan absolutely crushed it, how would we know?" Then I waited. What followed changed the way I think about planning. He didn't start talking about marketing. He didn't mention trade shows, campaigns, advertising, websites, or lead generation. Instead, he described what success would look like for the business. Revenue growth. New opportunities. Strategic wins. The kinds of outcomes that would make us all look back and say, "That was a great year." It was a simple conversation, but it revealed something important. Most planning starts with activity when it should start with outcomes. We spend a lot of time talking about what we're going to do before we've fully aligned on what we're trying to accomplish. That idea stayed with me for years. Later, when I discovered EOS, it immediately clicked. The 3-Year Picture, the 1-Year Plan, and quarterly Rocks all start with the same principle. Define the future first. Then work backward to determine what needs to happen next. Over time, that thinking evolved into what we now call the MAP Brief™. The MAP Brief™ is a simple tool we use with every client at Wonder. It helps leadership, sales, and marketing align around a shared vision of success before we ever start talking about campaigns or tactics. The first page captures the big picture. Where are we today? What does success look like three years from now? What needs to happen this year? What are the key strategies that will get us there? The second page translates those strategies into quarterly priorities. This is where strategy becomes activation. Instead of creating a long list of marketing activities, we identify the Rocks that matter most over the next 90 days and build momentum one quarter at a time. Like the EOS V/TO, what I love most about the MAP Brief™ is its simplicity. It's not a hundred-page strategic plan. It's not a complicated marketing framework. It's a conversation tool that helps everyone stay aligned around the same goals. We use it internally. We use it with clients. We revisit it regularly whenever priorities shift or new opportunities emerge. Most importantly, it helps answer a question that every leadership team should be asking: What has to be true for this year to be considered a success? Everything else becomes much easier once that answer is clear. We've made our MAP Brief™ template available as a free download. If you're looking for a simple way to align leadership, sales, and marketing around your annual objectives, I hope you'll give it a try. Download the Free MAP Brief™ Template Use it. Make it your own. We hope it helps your team create the same kind of alignment it has created for ours and for the clients we serve.